I've heard both. To me the NX-treme is definitely the better sounding speaker. The LS9 cannot match the triple OB subs that the NX-Treme has, and I find the LS9 highs to be a bit too hot for my tastes.
And the LS9 is easier to get good performance in a room compared to regular box speakers because it's a line array (and I love line arrays), but it still cannot match the ease of room integration that the NX-Treme has. JMHO.
I hold Tyson's opinion in high regard, but disagree about using the word "better" but instead use the comparative "different". The LS9 gives up very little in bass (but some)- which like the NX-Treme you can supplement with OB subs (but unlike them, you don't have to). Where it excels is in the creation of venue space or hall ambience. Classical music is their forte.
We all agree on the superiority of the NX-Treme (and most OB speakers) in room placement. They're just easier to get right than the LS9. Also, you can use a much smaller amp, since the low bass is not provided by the NX-Treme but by the additional subs. The LS9 requires real heft in an amp. As for a hot high end, it hasn't been an issue for my older ears. If anything, my friend that is a mastering engineer commented that he thought the highs needed a bit of accentuation. Oh well.
But when set up well, the LS9 has some advantages. The full line of electrostatic mid-tweeters from floor to about 7 ft. does some amazing stuff concerning spatial effects.
Disclaimer... I own the LS9's, but I've heard nearly all of Danny's designs. The Super7's and the LS9 are also different but really close in what they achieve. Some have stated they prefer the NX-Treme to the Super7, but that's not my preference. The only speaker I've heard that is clearly superior was Danny's prototype Line Force with the massive OB sub array. Holy mother, what an amazing experience. That's a different level,