I plugged the Pwave into the RCA outs of my NAD 752 and RAM CD player front end last night. You have to set one of the little switches on the back to "THRU - ON".
Well, this solves that lack of power problem I had with USB. I could never get high volume from the amp - I had to crank all of the gain settings on Media Ceter to get a moderate level. I can only guess that the gain between the USB/DAC circuit and the Tripath chip is lacking. This thing is designed for nearfield desktop computer use after all.
This thing rocks now! I had no trouble playing at any level I personally could stand with music. I'm well past the "turn it all the way up" stage, but at VERY high levels the amp still sounded very good. I should note that I use a subwoofer crossed over at 80hz. Mid-bass was as good as I have heard from the TS-1's.
I have decided that the Pwave is clearly better in one area - detail retrieval. That is an easy one - I'm hearing things in familiar recordings that the AMC missed.
I would have to say that the soundstage is wider and deeper now, and the amp takes on more authority overall when driven via RCA. The presentation is a little different than the tube amp - more forward, less subtle. Notice I said different, not better or worse. It will take me time to decide which I prefer more. Sometimes different isjust different, too.
There is absolutely no brightness or other nastiness, as long as the recording is decent of course. The only negative (relative to USB and the tube amp) is that there is more noise now. I can hear it standing in front of the speakers, but not at my listening position.
I have been told that Tripath amps sound their best after a couple months of breakin, and should leave the amp on all of the time. Still, most of the deficiencies I noted earlier largely went away when I used the RCA inputs.
I am going to put the Pwave through it's paces with movie soundtracks tonight. I'll let you know how it does.