AudioCircle
Other Stuff => Archived Manufacturer Circles => Hagerman Technology => Topic started by: jtwrace on 28 Jun 2014, 01:45 pm
-
Do you think you will be coming out with another headphone kit any time soon? If so, I request a fully balanced model and one that can drive hard to drive cans. :)
-
I haven't kept up with the latest in headphones. Describe "hard to drive". What impedance and power level are required.
jh
-
I haven't kept up with the latest in headphones. Describe "hard to drive". What impedance and power level are required.
jh
Mine are 50 ohm. 90dB/mW
-
That doesn't seem so difficult. Unless you're trying to use a cathode follower, which would not be particularly clever. Heck, my CASTANET easily drove 32 ohmers.
I was worried some of the new headphones required a very high voltage signal.
jh
-
That doesn't seem so difficult. Unless you're trying to use a cathode follower, which would not be particularly clever. Heck, my CASTANET easily drove 32 ohmers.
I was worried some of the new headphones required a very high voltage signal.
jh
OK. So what are the options? :green:
-
Maybe something that borrows pieces of the CASTANET. It was an expensive assortment of parts, though. Will require some re-thinking for getting the cost down to where a DIYer would want it.
jh
-
Castanet II on KickStarter, Jim?
What about moving away from parafeed (and costs associated with the iron) and looking into a little direct-coupled push-pull OTL specifically for headphones. 6c19pi?
-
I'm not sure how to get impedance low enough with OTL without resorting to feedback. A 6080 tube in parallel maybe. Just doesn't feel right to me. I'll have to think about it.
jh
-
Any news on this? Would be very interesting.
-
No news. Maybe 2015. Maybe 2016...
jh