0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 8444 times.
I'm interested in a description of the nature of differences, from early participants who heard a distinct difference.
I hope I am not crashing the party? I had a number of discs treated. I noticed slightly better focus and lower noise floor. The late Bob Crump didn't like cryogenics and had a comparison listening party with same disc cryoed and non cryo. He felt the cryo process destroyed important stage information. Same deal with his cabling. So I would encourage listeners to take note of any differences with respect to this aspect.
I'd love to see what happens to the data stream. Are there differences in the 1s and 0s, the value of the digital words in any meaningful sense?I can see where a botched optical layer would cause all kinds of read errors and software correction causing deviation from the source. But does cryo treating actually reduce errors and thereby render a more accurate signal?
1's & 0's ???? ... some say not?!An interesting read... http://www.audiostream.com/content/draft
Once again I come back to one of my overused old saws: less is more.YMMVDave