0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 18992 times.
Quote from: Occam on 5 Jan 2009, 01:35 amWho is that overprocessed guy singing with the nasal condition backed with the treacle infused violins? Yuck.That would be Jacque Brel, rather famous Belgian cabaret singer from the '60s. Definitely heavy on the dramatics, it seemed like a recording with a lot of sounds and volume changes. Recorded with tube gear, gotta be good, right?
Who is that overprocessed guy singing with the nasal condition backed with the treacle infused violins? Yuck.
Bill,Quote from: bwaslo on 5 Jan 2009, 05:00 amQuote from: Occam on 5 Jan 2009, 01:35 amWho is that overprocessed guy singing with the nasal condition backed with the treacle infused violins? Yuck.That would be Jacque Brel, rather famous Belgian cabaret singer from the '60s. Definitely heavy on the dramatics, it seemed like a recording with a lot of sounds and volume changes. Recorded with tube gear, gotta be good, right?This -http://www.libinst.com/monsoon%20DI%20of%20JMR.wavis Jaques Brel? Are you putting me on? I'm somewhat familiar with Brel, but more indirectly via the performaces of Charles Asnavour. With tubes no less. It still sounds like crap to me. Live and learn.Regards,Paul
..., the old rotating hearth/audio system -...Paul
If you are asserting that listening to a residual is equivalent to hearing the difference between 2 signals, I simply cannot agree.
Listening to the Diffmaker output of a stereo signal Diffed with the same signal with slight reverb and echo would be barely perceivable noise, listening to the original stereo signals the difference is quite obvious.
millionmonkey, why have you joined Audio Circle? You dont really seem to enjoy audio in any way, and instead only post to discourage other's beliefs. This is generally a place for people who are truly passion about audio.
but if it becomes their sole purpose to being active on AudioCircle then I would propose they go out and get a life,,,, get laid maybe.
This -http://www.libinst.com/monsoon%20DI%20of%20JMR.wavis Jaques Brel? Are you putting me on? I'm somewhat familiar with Brel, but more indirectly via the performaces of Charles Asnavour. With tubes no less. It still sounds like crap to me. Live and learn
Quotebut if it becomes their sole purpose to being active on AudioCircle then I would propose they go out and get a life,,,, get laid maybe.I was speaking to somebody the other day about this topic and they warned me that if I decided to ask for evidence about cables, etc that it would get very personal very quickly. How true. It's like telling a Scientologist that his emeter is BS. When I started asking these questions, I thought (foolishly) that there must be some facts backing the hype. But as I looked into it further, it has become more and more obvious that psychological rather than physical properties define how good a cable sounds. And yes people are free to delude themselves to their hearts content and say they hear things that are almost magical. But the problem come about when an average consumer (like me) tries to make a rational buying decision. Then you find out the Emperor has no clothes.And satfrat, while you seem to think you own Audiocircle, I dont think you do. Why I am here is none of your goddam business. You are not compelled to correspond with me. In fact, I'd prefer you didnt...
10e6Monkey,Do you live near NJ? If you want, I'll borrow the DAC Cherry amp again and we can listen to powercord swaps in which the difference has been easily heard by all 3 ((me, audiophile)(my wife, music lover non-audiophile)(Tommy, the designer of the amp who certainly DID NOT want to hear a difference)) who have had the chance to listen.I'd be glad to share this experience with you, as would many here. Don't know what else to say other than come and listen!-Mike
Well then, you'll just have to ship myself, wife, son and system to Australia. I figure we'll need at least a year to sort out this whole cord thing. -Mike