I have the F120A's big brothers, the F200As and drive them amazingly well with my 6 wpc Clari-T in a 2,000 cu. ft. (8 ft x 13 ft x 21 ft) room. I've tried 10 different amps with these speakers (Bob Brines FTA-2000s) and they deserve quality amps with high damping factors (that usually means solid state). Tube amps have produced muddy/bloated bass or been too weak (SETs). Cheaper solid state just sounds flat and lifeless. Digital and chip amps have done the best (detailed with dynamics and excellent bass grip). Most Fostex drivers thrive on tubes, but these aren't your typical thin, midrange heavy extended range drivers.
Is the Clari-T's 6 wpc enough? Anyone that has put more of the same quality of power to them agree that it's hard to go back to that 6 wpc. I compare the speakers to a well mannered dinner guest (with the Clari-T) versus a NFL linebacker in a tux (with a Patek, NuForce, etc.). Note I'm 49, listen mostly to jazz and classical at moderate levels. Going strictly by the numbers, the Clari-T will only take my speakers to 97 dB tops in my room versus recommended peak levels of 105 dB. Bottom line, the Clari-T just doesn't have the guts to put a commanding grip on the speakers. I recommend more power and bass control than a SET in my experience can provide.
I don't suppose the F120A in standmounted bass reflex is going to change character quite as much, and damping factor will probably be less of an issue, but you get the idea. I think the Omega F120A standmounts would be sweet, but I'll caution you that I've heard the TS3 versus Super 3 and the difference is not subtle (midbass with the TS3 is thin in comparison). Again the difference between FE127E and F120A may make a big difference. Check with Louis.