Smaller Footprint Superchunk Bass Trap ?'s

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 742 times.

jlafrenz

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 270
Smaller Footprint Superchunk Bass Trap ?'s
« on: 20 Apr 2018, 09:16 pm »
The previous superchunks I built were with regular "pink fluffy" insulation and had a 34" face. They work really well. I am needing to build some more of these in another room. I have several sheets of Owens Corning Fire Bat (similar to Safe and Sound) left from another project that I was hoping to use. The material is only 15" wide so if I cut it into triangles then the face of the traps would only be a little over 21".  I realize that larger superchunks are better and part of the design. 

So my question is this still worth building since it has such a smaller footprint?

Does the denser material make up for the fact that it is smaller?

Would I be better off building panels that straddle the corner instead?