AudioCircle

Audio/Video Gear and Systems => Open Baffle Speakers => Topic started by: bladesmith on 27 Jan 2014, 04:28 pm

Title: AMT, anyone use them ?
Post by: bladesmith on 27 Jan 2014, 04:28 pm
Anyone ever listen to one ? Or know anything good or bad about ATM's in general ?

I was pondering the use of one in an OB speaker. (WOOFER/AMT/WOOFER or WOOFER/MID/AMT)

http://www.parts-express.com/ess-heil-air-motion-transformer-amt-tweeter--264-600
Title: Re: AMT, anyone use them ?
Post by: TrungT on 27 Jan 2014, 04:55 pm


Rainier
(http://hawthorneaudio.us/wp-site/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Rainier-Pair-Front.jpg)
Title: Re: AMT, anyone use them ?
Post by: Brad on 27 Jan 2014, 05:22 pm
I'm working on a new OB using the AMT PRO4 tweeter.
I should have them up and going in the next month or so - I'll report back then, but I think it will work well.
Title: Re: AMT, anyone use them ?
Post by: GT Audio Works on 27 Jan 2014, 05:27 pm
In general I don't care much for ATM's...especially when they charge a fee !!!  :lol:
 
But AMT's I have heard a few, they sounded quite good....but I have not heard them enough to comment on their character of sound.
What I can tell you is they are designed to go lower into the midrange better than a pure ribbon tweeter which will run into power and excursion issues. The pleated diaphragm is more efficient at coupling with the air in the mid frequencies , enabling it to blend better with a woofer. But like everything in the world there is a compromise, the diaphragm material and bonded conductor is thicker than a ribbon which will not have the same top end response as a ribbon. This is not necessarily a bad thing...just something to consider in your design process. The Ess Heil unit is quite pricey...the Dayton unit is less than half the price and seems to have more radiating area http://www.parts-express.com/dayton-audio-amtpro-4-air-motion-transformer-tweeter-4-ohm--275-094. These units also seem to like at least 2nd order networks..something I don't. The Dayton unit boasts a diaphragm thickness of .0005, I don't know if this includes the conductor traces or not...this is not thin. You would think it could handle a 1st order network. The ribbon tweeter I build, which is aluminum foil bonded to mylar is much thinner and I have no problem crossing it over with a 1st order network.  Greg
Title: Re: AMT, anyone use them ?
Post by: bladesmith on 27 Jan 2014, 05:32 pm
TrungT,  those are very sweet, no doubt. (jealous)

Brad,

Are you using it in a two way or three way application ?

Couldn't a pair of woofers be used with it ?



Title: Re: AMT, anyone use them ?
Post by: bladesmith on 27 Jan 2014, 05:37 pm
In general I don't care much for ATM's...especially when they charge a fee !!!  :lol:
 
But AMT's I have heard a few, they sounded quite good....but I have not heard them enough to comment on their character of sound.
What I can tell you is they are designed to go lower into the midrange better than a pure ribbon tweeter which will run into power and excursion issues. The pleated diaphragm is more efficient at coupling with the air in the mid frequencies , enabling it to blend better with a woofer. But like everything in the world there is a compromise, the diaphragm material and bonded conductor is thicker than a ribbon which will not have the same top end response as a ribbon. This is not necessarily a bad thing...just something to consider in your design process. The Ess Heil unit is quite pricey...the Dayton unit is less than half the price and seems to have more radiating area http://www.parts-express.com/dayton-audio-amtpro-4-air-motion-transformer-tweeter-4-ohm--275-094. These units also seem to like at least 2nd order networks..something I don't. The Dayton unit boasts a diaphragm thickness of .0005, I don't know if this includes the conductor traces or not...this is not thin. You would think it could handle a 1st order network. The ribbon tweeter I build, which is aluminum foil bonded to mylar is much thinner and I have no problem crossing it over with a 1st order network.  Greg

Greg,
I have seen these (amt) used with other tweeters,  using the amt, kind of like a midrange driver.
Can your ribbon tweeter be set up with two woofers ?
Title: Re: AMT, anyone use them ?
Post by: TrungT on 27 Jan 2014, 05:37 pm
It's not mine, sorry.
 :oops:


This's mine
(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41IxAvX7zHL.jpg)
Title: Re: AMT, anyone use them ?
Post by: jimdgoulding on 27 Jan 2014, 05:40 pm

Rainier
(http://hawthorneaudio.us/wp-site/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Rainier-Pair-Front.jpg)
Damn, T, I think it's about time I ventured to Dallas and we dine together and listen to some tunes!
Title: Re: AMT, anyone use them ?
Post by: TrungT on 27 Jan 2014, 05:45 pm
I think John (InfernoSTi) has the Rainier and he's not too far from you Jim.
And you can ventured to Dallas, dinner is on me.   :thumb:
Title: Re: AMT, anyone use them ?
Post by: bladesmith on 27 Jan 2014, 06:11 pm

This's mine
(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41IxAvX7zHL.jpg)

TrungT,

What are those ?
Title: Re: AMT, anyone use them ?
Post by: GT Audio Works on 27 Jan 2014, 07:22 pm
Greg,
I have seen these (amt) used with other tweeters,  using the amt, kind of like a midrange driver.
Can your ribbon tweeter be set up with two woofers ?
Sure you can augment the upper range of an AMT with a ribbon tweeter....but my tweeter is a line scource like in a Maggie,
not suitable for an MTM arrangement.
Title: Re: AMT, anyone use them ?
Post by: Pete Schumacher on 27 Jan 2014, 08:14 pm
Anyone ever listen to one ? Or know anything good or bad about ATM's in general ?

I was pondering the use of one in an OB speaker. (WOOFER/ATM/WOOFER or WOOFER/MID/ATM)

http://www.parts-express.com/ess-heil-air-motion-transformer-amt-tweeter--264-600

A far better AMT than that particular version can be had at Parts Express also.

http://www.parts-express.com/aurum-cantus-ast30100-aero-striction-tweeter--276-442

The AST can be run in dipole mode by removing the felt pad on the back.

Another fantastic AMT is the Beyma TPL150.  It too can be run dipole by removing the rear chamber.
Title: Re: AMT, anyone use them ?
Post by: jimdgoulding on 27 Jan 2014, 08:18 pm
I think John (InfernoSTi) has the Rainier and he's not too far from you Jim.
And you can ventured to Dallas, dinner is on me.   :thumb:
It is my intention to come to Dallas soon to audition some DeVore's at Audio Concepts and the venerable Maggie 1.7's.  I will definitely get in touch.  You might care to join me.  Hope so.
Title: Re: AMT, anyone use them ?
Post by: TrungT on 27 Jan 2014, 08:39 pm


Elac (http://www.elac.com/en/products/Line_400/BS_403/)





Title: Re: AMT, anyone use them ?
Post by: mgalusha on 27 Jan 2014, 08:48 pm
I use the Beyma TPL-150H in by big two ways, crossover over at ~1200Hz, quasi 3rd order. I like them very much, smooth, high efficiency and extended. I won't post a pic, not open baffle. :)


Title: Re: AMT, anyone use them ?
Post by: Tyson on 27 Jan 2014, 08:54 pm
I can vouch that the TLP-150H is phenomenal - I've heard it in Mike's system and damn its good.
Title: Re: AMT, anyone use them ?
Post by: Brad on 27 Jan 2014, 09:34 pm
Brad,

Are you using it in a two way or three way application ?

Couldn't a pair of woofers be used with it ?

I am going to use the AMT PRO4 crossed over around ~1900hz to a Hawthorne Sterling Silver 15"  midwoofer
I'll have two Hawthorne Augie 15s per side, operating up to about 60hz
Title: Re: AMT, anyone use them ?
Post by: Brad on 27 Jan 2014, 09:37 pm
Pete/Mike,

Thanks for the links on the other drivers.   They were a bit out of my price category during initial concept time, but either that Aurum or the Beyma would provide an upgrade path for me   :thumb:
Title: Re: AMT, anyone use them ?
Post by: mgalusha on 27 Jan 2014, 11:11 pm
Thanks for the links on the other drivers.   They were a bit out of my price category during initial concept time, but either that Aurum or the Beyma would provide an upgrade path for me   :thumb:

That is the big downside, they are quite proud of them.
Title: Re: AMT, anyone use them ?
Post by: solhaga on 27 Feb 2014, 07:05 pm
I built my own.

Membrane:

(https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-OL_d6mfMUKg/UryiM5FE9uI/AAAAAAAADAc/iVA6CZ6ycyY/s800/2013_12_17-2280.jpg)

goes into a magnet structure:

(https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-urp0vaxCtxA/UpD0emTd_BI/AAAAAAAAC58/1dDYhfebRPE/s600/2013_11_23-2207.jpg)

that gets a wave guide:

(https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-9lK_JU_u3pM/UryjQ3ZF4VI/AAAAAAAADA0/YdxeVcB3VaM/s800/2013_12_17-2282.jpg)

that is mounted in a baffle together with three magnet mount AE TD15Ds:

(https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-cKepxWx5st8/UpobS3g8zDI/AAAAAAAAC6k/H-Yv4USNXT8/s800/2013_11_30-2211.jpg)

Complete system:

(https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-KwKd0PjP9qU/UpobSjGNQKI/AAAAAAAAC6c/X0Q5zS2G8ic/s800/2013_11_30-2209.jpg)
Title: Re: AMT, anyone use them ?
Post by: InfernoSTi on 26 May 2014, 04:04 am
TrungT,

What are those ?

Those are mine, Trung…you got it! I'm between Austin and San Antonio these days…

(http://www.audiocircle.com/image.php?id=99993)

Best,
John
Title: Re: AMT, anyone use them ?
Post by: bladesmith on 26 May 2014, 06:52 am
Very interesting work.!  8)

I built my own.

Membrane:

(https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-OL_d6mfMUKg/UryiM5FE9uI/AAAAAAAADAc/iVA6CZ6ycyY/s800/2013_12_17-2280.jpg)

goes into a magnet structure:

(https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-urp0vaxCtxA/UpD0emTd_BI/AAAAAAAAC58/1dDYhfebRPE/s600/2013_11_23-2207.jpg)



that gets a wave guide:

(https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-9lK_JU_u3pM/UryjQ3ZF4VI/AAAAAAAADA0/YdxeVcB3VaM/s800/2013_12_17-2282.jpg)

that is mounted in a baffle together with three magnet mount AE TD15Ds:

(https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-cKepxWx5st8/UpobS3g8zDI/AAAAAAAAC6k/H-Yv4USNXT8/s800/2013_11_30-2211.jpg)

Complete system:

(https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-KwKd0PjP9qU/UpobSjGNQKI/AAAAAAAAC6c/X0Q5zS2G8ic/s800/2013_11_30-2209.jpg)
Title: Re: AMT, anyone use them ?
Post by: bladesmith on 28 Oct 2014, 06:27 pm
I built my own.

Membrane:

(https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-OL_d6mfMUKg/UryiM5FE9uI/AAAAAAAADAc/iVA6CZ6ycyY/s800/2013_12_17-2280.jpg)

goes into a magnet structure:

(https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-urp0vaxCtxA/UpD0emTd_BI/AAAAAAAAC58/1dDYhfebRPE/s600/2013_11_23-2207.jpg)

that gets a wave guide:

(https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-9lK_JU_u3pM/UryjQ3ZF4VI/AAAAAAAADA0/YdxeVcB3VaM/s800/2013_12_17-2282.jpg)

that is mounted in a baffle together with three magnet mount AE TD15Ds:

(https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-cKepxWx5st8/UpobS3g8zDI/AAAAAAAAC6k/H-Yv4USNXT8/s800/2013_11_30-2211.jpg)

Complete system:

(https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-KwKd0PjP9qU/UpobSjGNQKI/AAAAAAAAC6c/X0Q5zS2G8ic/s800/2013_11_30-2209.jpg)

How has your project been going ?

Any synopsis on the handmade driver ?

Thanks....
Title: Re: AMT, anyone use them ?
Post by: solhaga on 28 Oct 2014, 07:45 pm
I´ve been listening with pleasure to the same pair of membranes since February.

The only tweak I´ve done is to paint the whole setup black:

(https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-wJCL-GnNJd0/U30OSkfppWI/AAAAAAAADI0/FIWP-KP5oeY/s800/2014_05_20-4617.jpg)

Even the woofers´ phase plugs:

(https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-2iZz0E7dHhs/U4I1mCRO9vI/AAAAAAAADJk/Kq9FzrT5dGc/s800/2014_05_25-4633.jpg)

(https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-4Hx3Yx07uD4/U4I10q8n3LI/AAAAAAAADKE/62u9f4aRbyw/s800/2014_05_25-4733.jpg)

There´s a thread on diyaudio if you want to know more: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/planars-exotics/232634-yet-another-diy-amt.html (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/planars-exotics/232634-yet-another-diy-amt.html)

Title: Re: AMT, anyone use them ?
Post by: bladesmith on 9 Dec 2014, 04:04 pm
A far better AMT than that particular version can be had at Parts Express also.

http://www.parts-express.com/aurum-cantus-ast30100-aero-striction-tweeter--276-442

The AST can be run in dipole mode by removing the felt pad on the back.

Another fantastic AMT is the Beyma TPL150.  It too can be run dipole by removing the rear chamber.
Pete,

The specs on that Aurum Cantus AST30100 Aero Striction Tweeter, are wicked sweet.
(my high-end audio terminology isn't as sophisticated as some audiophiles. :lol:)

And the ability to alter or remove the padding on the back might make it more flexible experimenting with an OB speaker design.
(if that pad is removable ?)

 :thumb: