Interesting Article in The Scientist on why Humans Respond to Music at all

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 1105 times.

dcbingaman

  • Industry Participant
  • Posts: 271
  • VPE Aerospace Consulting, LLC - LDW Model 1
See:http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/48593/title/Understanding-the-Roots-of-Human-Musicality/&utm_campaign=NEWSLETTER_TS_The-Scientist-Daily_2016&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=44122546&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8HtNRdJvpbRtpyvj9J4vHCG8b94o6mZ6_U2rvrOfYVaDyr-Tw3XDLmUzY-yT44rgR676eR_g4yN7_pJ6DIpZQqzeQuiw&_hsmi=44122546/

daves

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 978
Don, I would wager that evolution would favor the audiophile and better ears.

How else could one decipher whether a polyrhythmic drum beat meant "come on over for a beer" rather than. "we are coming over to steal your women and kill you", or the tonal difference between a lion's guttural call to her wandering kids, or chastising others to tighten up the stalking pride on the hunt.

electricbear

However, as audiophiles we have taken things to the extreme. Not only can we discern if the lion is taking a drink, we can tell if he's drinking Desani or Evian.

Bob2

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1836
  • De gustibus non est disputandum
However, as audiophiles we have taken things to the extreme. Not only can we discern if the lion is taking a drink, we can tell if he's drinking Desani or Evian.
:green:

mjmsound

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 123
What?? What did you say, I can't hear you!!! OH, let me turn my music down! :duh: