Talked (voice, on the phone) with someone who's name readers might recognize named Bob Carver. IIRC he is the first one to mention that AES and/or other studies indicate human hearing can barely differentiate differences in bass THD from 1% to about 30%. Yes, in God's infinite wisdom He apparently designed us with extremely high tolerance to HD in the bass range. If true, and I believe it is, the promises for low THD in subs are generally vain marketing gimmicks and nothing else except profits for speaker companies and advertisers.
Per speaker designer/engineer John Krutke of Zaph Audio, we also have similarly high tolerance to FR aberrations in the top octave (possibly low tolerance to THD in the treble...he described high tolerance to FR aberrations).
Then there's that old story about how accurately your ear/brain mechanism can follow, while blindfolded, the arc of a coin as it turns on the pavement or concrete in a person's proximity. All about distortion and phase sensitivity in the critical mid band for wavelengths similar to the 8" between our two stereoscopic ears.
I got to hear Brian Cheney's humongous bass towers when I visited and they were set up in his sound room for whatever reason, demo, crossover tuning, etc. I used to think the startlingly fantastic bass performance was a function of lower bass THD. Now I instead think it was mostly a function of less floor-ceiling bounce resulting from the almost floor to ceiling array of active bass drivers, and less THD in the mid/treble array.
The most audible frequent source of bass disturbance is the timing distortion caused by modes. Lowering THD to zero has sum total zero effect on bass mode issues, which IMO can equal hundreds of percent of distortion because we're talking about wrong disharmonious notes playing when they should not.
Thinking about this further though: it is definitely possible to exceed even 30% THD @ high output in the first octave. So maybe doubling the woofers could lower THD enough to make audible upgrade.