AudioCircle

Audio/Video Gear and Systems => Critic's Circle (Equipment Reviews) => Speaker Reviews => Topic started by: Construct on 30 Jul 2010, 03:27 am

Title: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: Construct on 30 Jul 2010, 03:27 am
VMPS NEW LARGER SUB
(http://i773.photobucket.com/albums/yy17/trondisc/VMPS/001-2.jpg)
(http://i773.photobucket.com/albums/yy17/trondisc/VMPS/003.jpg)
What is it?
A passive subwoofer consisting of a 12"  and 15"  active driver with a 15"  mass-tuned/slot loaded passive radiator.
I hope I can write this so it communicates sincerely.  There is a fine line between enthusiastic and being a fan boy. I am a healthy skeptic.  I have been away from 2-channel listening (except for armature-type earphones) for many years.  I no longer have a lot of the original hyper expensive high end gear I accumulated in the 90’s and early 00. I will say that I have been on a DIY and modding tear for the past few months.  I am developing a 2-channel music rig that isn’t going to have the huge overhead costs. As weird as it sound, in this economy I am attempting to make a 2-channel music system that isn’t a money pit. I tend to keep gear now, no more of the quarterly or semi-annual “upgrades.”
 
Soapbox:
There is no replacement for displacement.  If you are talking street performance or subwoofers, it’s all about moving air mass.  In a medium large to large listening area, I have yet to really enjoy a small sub. I have been recommended powered subs that sounded musical, but not particularly potent.  Don’t even get me started on those home theater ported subs that rattle things with globs of 80hz energy but taper to nothing in the 30’s.  Those are truly Satan’s handiwork. They are a demonic plague foisted on fidelity-loving humanity; much like Bose and Mp3’s.  I have a word for a transducer that reproduces audio down to 30hz and tapers off.  I like to refer to them as a “woofers.”  The term “SUB” doesn’t apply.  I have heard the argument that 15” and 18” drivers are sloppy. Cheap drivers with a weak motor certainly are. Stuffing a big sub into a small room will do it too. Why use them in a room that won’t support low bass? A 15” sub in a 10x12 room?  Please.
 
 I subscribe to the philosophy of parts express Dayton titanic sub kits.  In many subs under a grand (or more), you are getting an abysmally cheap driver. I can’t argue with that because I have heard too many examples that bear this out.  (Anyone remember Radio Shack subs?  I shudder at the thought.) I hate it when subs bottom out easily trying to keep up: that horrible rattling and clicking during a Mussorgsky piece. “SUBS” have found their way into homes that don’t even use them as subs.  Listening to mp3’s or movie explosions isn’t a test of a music sub.  It’s more of a test of compressed but heavy mid bass and personal tolerance to noise.  It seems like when I hear subs mentioned in conversation, it’s usually about car subwoofers, or the aforementioned HT subs.  I wanted orchestral deep bass with 20hz fundamentals, not passing off mid bass as low bass. Ideally, this would bring a proper sense of scale with an equivalent SPL.  Yes, I have tried 12” “tube” subs in the past.  They work for some things, but don’t have the same impact effect, for example as a forward firing 15” Velodyne.  I prefer the boxed sub like the high end Velodynes, just can’t justify the expense right now-especially the 18” model.  Hell, maybe I am nuts right now for thinking I needed to spend $1,200 on a new sub. Or maybe, I just miss bass quality and quantity bad enough to rationalize buying the VMPS.   
 
My order
I do remember the original larger sub, it was a vertical sub, with the 12” driver above the 15” active.  The reviews have all been excellent and part of the reason I went this route.  The new larger sub has a “lowboy” horizontal configuration with the active drivers side by side. I opted for light oak, because the cabinet is going to get a new finish (red chestnut-see pic) and a clear coat to match my refinished speakers.  After talking with the John “bioforce” Casler (Summit Audio here in the forum) about options, I requested the carbon fiber megawoofer which is a $140.00 upgrade.   I agreed it was best that I went with external amplification.  It can’t be good for anything electronic (like a plate amp) to get shaken brutally while attached to a big sub. The plate amp is one of the weaknesses of my DIY sub. For use in my HT system, it’s not that vital.

Unpacking and setup.
The amp and the sub base frame arrived day 1. I was hoping the sub was there too, it was not to be. With that “teenager watching a twilight movie” glee, I finally got the big, heavy box from the driver hand-dollied into my garage. My first step was to unbox and inspect, and then immediately work on it’s new finish.  I had every intent of going out and enjoying the sunny day while it dried.  I also prepared some audioquest IC’s and speaker cable. 

The subwoofer amp: (from the VMPS instructions)
Thank you for purchasing the VMPS 1000w subwoofer amplifier, one of the most versatile and powerful subwoofer amplifiers available. The tabletop or rack-mountable design is perfect for all VMPS Model Subs and high-end home theater and Audiophile apps. With 1,000 clean watts of power into 4 ohms, it can drive ALL our subwoofer systems.
It’s a Dayton audio SA1000  class a/b  sub amp.
 
 
I prepped my amp eq by the following instructions posted by Brian Cheney:
When you get your amp please notice the "EQ" section which should be used to notch out the floor-to-ceiling room mode that does not yield to placement or other remedies.
Measure your ceiling height, which will tell you what mode frequency to cut.  Using a Q=0.25 cut the following frequencies by 3 to 4 dB:
8ft ceiling 71Hz
9ft ceiling 63Hz
10ft ceiling 56Hz
Also be sure to do "putty pinching" as per the instructions here.  This will trim system Q to your equipment, speaker wire, and associated equipment.  A fingernail full of putty at a time removed from the center of the PR is all you want.  Go slowly.
If your ceiling is taller than 10 ft simply divide the number 565 by its measured maximum height, then cut that frequency.
Example: 12ft ceiling = 47Hz.”
I measured the room, and set up accordingly. The extreme versatility here is that I am not just using electronic bass management, but I can also use physical bass management by adjusting the passive radiators mass damping putty by a few grams here or there.  This sub is not relying on a servo (which as you can read elsewhere-aren’t the solution for every bass situation) or electronics alone.  This sub takes a little more tweaking, but as a result will give you more of a tuning and damping range. Since my floor is concrete...it means less fiddling, and less room structural excitement.
 
A few comparisons:
The parts express Dayton titanic sub kits do outperform the HT subs out there for music, and tend to be pretty close to the best of them for HT.  For music against a music sub, that’s a different story.
I like to classify the ability of subs in these categories:  1) Incapable of significant 1st octave bass (many HT or small subs) 2) Presence of 1st octave bass, but with compromises 3) Strong  of 1st octave bass, but with compromises  4) Presence of 1st octave bass with significant quality, but not superior energy 5.)  1st octave bass with significantly powerful impact and high quality.  The 12” Dayton is a category 2.  The 15” Dayton is a category 3.  The Hsu and REL strata are category 4.  They have quality, decent power (but not massive air-moving slam in the lowest reaches). I started with Nikolai Andreyevich Rimsky-Korsakov’s Scheherazade” and John Ottman’s soundtrack to “Superman returns.”  That was enough to determine the limitations of the 12 and 15” Dayton titanic III kit subs.  Those subs ship with a class G (500w) and class D (1000w) on board plate amp respectively.   Here is the bottom line:  The 12” sub was adequate to provide deep bass presence, but not heft.  It was obvious these recordings had low bass energy in parts, but there was a unfocused quality, much like an HT movie explosion.  The 15” Dayton titanic kit had significantly greater low end and great slam.  The same problem existed though.  For music like this, the focus/definition was lacking.  I can rightfully classify these subs as fine for 80% HT, 20% music, but cannot say these subs hold up to critical listening.  Surprisingly, my Hsu TN1220HO sub had better definition than either sub, but lacked the impact of the forward firing 15” Dayton kit sub.  The HSU has its own rack-type amp. The Hsu sounded like it filled in the bottom, but didn’t communicate it with that huge body-punch effect of good box subs. The REL strata III was wonderfully musical, and was in between the 12” and 15” Dayton in terms of heft, albeit with better definition.  Great music sub, but not the seismic generator I am after.  I cannot recommend the Dayton titanic for use in high end audio.  It just won’t match the definition of top notch main speakers.


  Dialing it in.
   I was instructed to remove bits of damping putty from the passive radiator in the “fingernail” full.  That is, about 1-2 grams at a time.  I ended up removing about 4 fingernails full.  I ended up setting the sub amp to cutoff sharply at 60hz.  Rule #1 I learned in the 80’s:  Never start with synthesizer bass, because you have no real frame of reference as to how it’s really supposed to sound.  I have medium  carpet over concrete in my listening room, so unlike some environments, I don’t have a lot of sympathetic noise from the room.  The concrete is pretty good at reflecting the bass and not rumbling with it.  This simply gives me cleaner bass than is possible in my upstairs HT room.

Mjolnir. You know how the output is listed for tube subs (HSU/SVS) and things like REL strata?  They might as well take the back seat.  The amount of air they move and impact is considerably less compared to this sub.  This sub is Mjolnir: Thor’s hammer.  It has output similar to an 18”, 4 grand Velodyne sub. “Thou shalt be moved” This sub has overwhelming power compared to even my 15”/1000 watt Dayton titanic III sealed box sub.  It has the ability to unleash orchestral bass that would scare those HT subs out of the house.  Here is where I separate from the small two way only or any bass limited system  Realism, to me is palapable, 1st octave bass.  Without it, there is no way to sound like a live drum kit or electric bass because small or bass limited speakers just don’t produce the same energy as the real thing.   You should not expect the same flabby, boomy midbass you get from HT subs.  At first you may think “feh”  in some circumstances, yet when  the recording calls for it---the concrete floor shakes and the air is energized.

The very definition of bass.
 It has musical definition like the REL strat, a smaller and highly rated sub.You know the sub is blending, and in the zone when it doesn't load the room up with 2nd octave and duplicate the main speakers.  The sub should be defined and sensitive enough to tackle guitar strings, yet brutal enough to reproduce cannon shots , organ notes and other 1st octave energy with the same alacrity. I am getting a realistic, palpable attack and body from the guitar strings on "Man of constant sorrow" (O brother where art thou) and symphonic weight from telarc's "space spectacular."  Listen to the opening of Star Trek:  the motion picture of Battlestar galactica theme.  That is some potent bass.  Don’t expect every orchestral bit to have massive low end because some recordings just don’t have it to begin with.  For example, as good as Basil Pouldaris “Anvil of crom”  is, it doesn’t have the same energy as a telarc recording of Mussogsky:  night on bald mountain/pictures at an exhibition.  The best of Tony Williams:  drums sound like drums.  The punch, the low end, the presence.  Not possible without a serious 1st octave output. 

EPILOGUE:As good as the original tallboy was (Reviewed back in the day by Bert Whyte), the lowboy has better drivers, now, even better than the carbon fiber drivers offered before.  There is a storm coming.  No, not the new Thor movie, but that’s cool too.  What I am referring to is the OMG series new larger sub that includes the un-freaking-believably omnipotent TC sounds drivers.  Those drivers will be able to deliver subsonics powerful enough to recreate a REAL subway going though your listening room.  When I get the scratch, I really want to upgrade.  Much like Thor’s hammer, TC sounds drivers have the potential to crack the earths crust.  In the meantime, I am happy with a sub that won’t just hang in there with the huge, megabuck velodynes, it does it for a fraction of the price.  The Dayton titanic may separate the dreck from the high end, the VMPS new larger sub separates real performance from high end toys.  Stay out of the boutiques, and you don’t need a servo sub or to spend several grand.  This sub does it all and it cost me all of $1,200 shipped with an amp.  Spending 3 times as much won’t improve anything. However, buy one or two of the OMG subs and you will be playing with something that dwarfs Velodyne, and still spend less than one Velodyne. Note the cost of Velodynes top end 18”  sub.  Now look at a TC-sounds equipped very large array sub from VMPS.  No contest! The Velodyne hasn’t just met its match, it’s now not the most capable sub for under 10 grand. 




Recommended subwoofer tests:
Telarc:  space spectacular
Time/Life classical thunder (telarc)
Rob Wasserman:  solo
Enya:  greatest hits
James Horner: Titanic soundtrack
Basil Pouldaris: Conan the barbarian soundtrack
Andreas Vollenweider: various
Bela Fleck and the Flecktones:  flight of the cosmic hippo
Al Dimeola: Kiss my Axe
Crystal method: Vegas
Propellerheads: decksanddrumsandrockandroll
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: TomS on 30 Jul 2010, 11:40 am
Great job and very thorough review.  Enjoy the new sub!  Tom
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: Construct on 30 Jul 2010, 02:35 pm
Great job and very thorough review.  Enjoy the new sub!  Tom
Thanks!
I think it's time people paid more attention to these subs, especially since TC sounds are on the way for a very reasonable price. Instead of gimmicks, hype or extreme pricing, I am getting real world, practical and extreme performance. Ironically, this is the first time I didn't pay attention to mainsteam sub hype, and it paid off.
Incidentally, the REL and HSU subs were sold... awww.  Anybody need a 12"  dayton titanic III?  :D
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: woodsyi on 30 Jul 2010, 02:53 pm
Great job.  :thumb:

I have played around with these subs as well.  :wink:

http://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=65337.0 (http://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=65337.0)



Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: Construct on 30 Jul 2010, 02:56 pm
Great job.  :thumb:

I have played around with these subs as well.  ;)

http://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=65337.0 (http://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=65337.0)
Cool!  I used to have RM40's, sold them due to going overseas a few years ago.  Back then, people just didn't know how good they are. If any other company won half has many awards and praises as VMPS has in the past 10 years the hype would be endless.  I feel there is a hype-gap here....  :o
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: Construct on 30 Jul 2010, 03:34 pm
Speaking of hype gap...  Companies with huge ad budgets (and clever ad men)  produce an "image"  for boutique brand speakers.  No cost is too high, no description too poetic or lofty.  Fans of such products that saturate CES, THE SHOW and high end audio mags viciously defend and endlessly tout the merits of the latest speaker or sub du jour. 

There are some fine subs out there, but I seem to remember certain brands getting stratified to a level you'd think God made them.  VMPS seems to have been flying under the radar since the inception.  Sure, there has been a few reviews (nothing like other companies that get reviews for every model, every time).  But that must go with the territory of not throwing cash into the full-page ad machine, or charging $4,000 instead of $1,200.  At $1,200, certain segments of the audio society will confuse it with a mass-market HT sub, or dismiss it because it's not expensive enough.  Other brands may reflect VSOP cognac and Havanas, VMPS is more like a Spartan.  One VMPS = many of the others put together.

Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: Brian Cheney on 30 Jul 2010, 05:10 pm
Thanks for the kind words, Construct.

The base model of the Larger is $699.  The Megawoofer upgrade to the Eminence 15"/100oz motor and Misco 12", 80oz plus our new "big bump" PR is $200.  The all TC Sound 12" and 15" version (with the "big bump" PR) is $1399.  All prices plus shipping for 140lbs from the West coast, 200lbs for the TC Sounds version which requires driver assembly and mounting. The Dayton 1000W rackmount amp with 24dB continuously variable electronic xover and single band EQ is $399. The New Larger features a 1" thick MDF 8 cu ft Bud Bailey cabinet in lite or dark oak, cherry, or gloss black finishes.

Construct mentions our non-use of servo control.  Grossly simplied, it is accurate to say servos correct for errors after they happen.  This is fine for steady-state signals and gives good measurements with swept sine tones.  It's not so good for transient material such as percussive bass.

The VSS (Very Solid Subwoofer) is a double-thick, 7.5 cu ft single active driver version of the Larger and features a TC Sound 15" and the "big bump" PR in rosewood, ebony and black finishes.  It ships at about 300lbs and is $1899ea for wood veneers and $2099 for piano black. Driver assembly and mounting is required.  We recommend the same $399 rackmount Dayton amp with the VSS.

Finally, the VLA (Very Large Array) is a 6ft tall, 450 lb, 12 cu ft Subwoofer tower with four TC Sounds 12" actives and two side-firing "big bump" PR's.  It's $5900ea in oak or black finishes including the 1000W rackmount amp.  Exotic veneers are extra, contact us for quote. Driver assembly and mounting are required.
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: ctviggen on 30 Jul 2010, 05:24 pm
Thanks for the kind words, Construct.

The base model of the Larger is $699.  The Megawoofer upgrade to the Eminence 15"/100oz motor and Misco 12", 80oz plus our new "big bump" PR is $200.  The all TC Sound 12" and 15" version (with the "big bump" PR) is $1399.  All prices plus shipping for 140lbs from the West coast, 200lbs for the TC Sounds version which requires driver assembly and mounting.

60 pounds more just for the drivers?  Those must be massive.
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: woodsyi on 30 Jul 2010, 05:31 pm
So what would be the field upgrade price (with old drivers traded in) for the Larger sub if I replace both 12" and 15" drivers with TC Sound Drivers and upgrade the passive?  Do you need to glue the new ones too?
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: Brian Cheney on 30 Jul 2010, 06:15 pm
The 15" TC woofer ships at 43lbs and the 12" at 25lbs.  That is massive.

Replacing the 12" and 15" actives and 15" passive with the TC and "big bump" PR is $766 plus shipping, $100 credit for the old actives in good shape returned freight ppd.  You do not have to return the old PR.
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: srb on 30 Jul 2010, 07:01 pm
The 15" TC woofer ships at 43lbs and the 12" at 25lbs.  That is massive.

Brian,

The photo you posted in the "The New VMPS OMG Sub series" topic looks to be the TC Sounds LMS-R Series.
 
If so, PE lists the LMS-R 12" actual weight at 38.3 lbs. and the LMS-R 15" at 43.4 lbs., and they both use the same 195 oz. magnet motor structure.
 
Is that information correct?
 
Steve
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: Brian Cheney on 30 Jul 2010, 08:31 pm
You're right, I was looking at the wrong info. 
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: srb on 30 Jul 2010, 08:57 pm
Even more massive!
 
Steve
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: Construct on 31 Jul 2010, 04:14 am
Brian:        Sie haben Post.
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: Brian Cheney on 31 Jul 2010, 06:53 pm
I should point out Construct has the latest version of the Megawoofers (Eminence 15", Misco 12", Big Bump PR ($200 upgrade) in his LSW.
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: Construct on 31 Jul 2010, 06:55 pm
I want to state for anyone considering upgrade:  It really isn't viable to upgrade one of the active drivers.  The TC sounds drivers need to be upgraded: both at the same time.  And they also must have the big bump PR.  The new TC drivers will require the mass loading to be re-tuned.  The 15"  TC is available now, the 12"  in october, which is my target month for upgrade.
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: Construct on 31 Jul 2010, 10:36 pm
Notes:  on the Dayton SA1000:  do not use "bass boost"  (back panel switch).  It's suitable for HT or a disco, but not controlled bass.  I used it during the 1812 overture, but found it would push the amp to clipping and induce an unwanted "hump"  in the mid 20's.  I stopped using it.  I am now using the output as a high pass for my mains/back into preamp.  I set the -14db control at 80hz. 
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: Construct on 31 Jul 2010, 10:46 pm
I just tested the settings with Bach:  tocatta & fugue  in G minor.  The pipe organ notes vibrate  the floor as much as they are audible.
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: John Casler on 1 Aug 2010, 08:29 pm
Scott,

That is likely the best SUB review I have read outside of a Pro Rag like Absolute Sound or Stereophile.  :thumb:

The very first speaker I ever purchased from Brian was a Tall Boy LARGER (years ago).

I still have it and it kicks booty sitting behind my listening seat firing AWAY from me.  I then have stereo LARGERs in the frontal firing plane (equidistant as the MAINS which are BCSE RM40's)

The phase is set to a "push/pull" with the frontal array pushing and the rear TALL BOY firing away from me pulling.

i might add that you certainly covered the fact that B's subs have significant power and weight, but my mind also boggles at the micro-resolving power they have (when well tuned) on the more subtle details of bass harmonics, overtones and resolution.

THAT is what the low distortion of a system like this will bring to the table.

So we DO have the SLEDGE HAMMER, but we also have the fine "jeweler's mallet" that can provide the precision to help us with the finer musical facets all in one BIG box :green:

I posted this cut on my "JAC's Cut of the Day" thread from Bela Fleck and Victor Wooten.

Off this album


(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41VQ2Y72NYL._SL500_AA300_.jpg)

Listen here:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/recsradio/radio/B000002N7R/ref=pd_krex_dp_002_001?ie=UTF8&track=001&disc=002 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/recsradio/radio/B000002N7R/ref=pd_krex_dp_002_001?ie=UTF8&track=001&disc=002)


It displays those harmonics and overtones.  It is an incredible bargain being a DOUBLE album of great music and most of it with the incredible BASS of Wooten.
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: satfrat on 1 Aug 2010, 08:39 pm
Quote
The phase is set to a "push/pull" with the frontal array pushing and the rear TALL BOY firing away from me pulling.

John, does this "push/pull" setting mean the subs are 180 degrees out of phase? Thanks.  :D
 
 
Cheers,
Robin
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: John Casler on 1 Aug 2010, 09:43 pm

John, does this "push/pull" setting mean the subs are 180 degrees out of phase? Thanks.  :D
 
 
Cheers,
Robin

Hi Robin,

It means that the woofers in front are pushing toward you and the woofers behind you are pulling away from you.

For more clarity;

If the woofer behind you is "facing you" then you would run it "out of phase".

If the woofer behind you is facing away from you, then it is run "in phase".

The frontal woofs are always "in phase" and it is the rears that are adjusted depending on the orientation of the rear woofs.

You have to grasp that as the front woofs push at you, you want the motion of the rear woofs to be in the same direction.  The actual phasing then depends on the orientation of the rear woofer.

Since bass frequencies are somewhat hemisperical in their radiation you want the energy of the "push" action of each woofer to be in the same direction.

The concept of Anti or Reverse Phase came from the common placement, where the front woofers were on the front wall, in phase and moving at you. (pushing) and the wear woofers were on the rear wall, but to get them moving in the same direction you needed to reverse the phase.

So regular or reverse phasing will depend on the "orientation" of the rear woofs.

As my Physics Professor FL Yost used to say; "Clear?" :duh:

Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: satfrat on 1 Aug 2010, 09:47 pm
Gotsha John,,, thanks for the explanation.  :thumb:
 
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: Construct on 2 Aug 2010, 12:56 am
John,   
    My intent with the review was to be as fair as possible, and provide a direct comparison to subs I have/had.  I have been recommended umpteen subs in the past, and they always fell short. I wish I had a dollar for every time I read "Zomg!!!  DUDE... this sub is wicked sick!"  Just to find out it performed sickly compared to the claims. The best bang for the buck was the 15"  dayton titanic III.  I felt the burn when I ended up with subs that the maggie crowd recommended the REL, but that sub just didn't have the cajones.  The tube-snake boogie subs didn't impact or move air, and the porthole subs all sounded boomy and undefined to me.  At that point I said I need to cut my losses and stay with the least overall compromised and that was the dayton. 
       I will not that when certain companies come out with a sub, the press reviews EVERY SINGLE MODEL.  How long has it been since there has been any VMPS sub review like the new larger, super solid or VLA?  I dunno but I see reviews for seemingly every single other company--and the resultant  hype.  The VMPS subs are a well kept secret compared to REL, SVS or the others that seem to be mainstream press darlings.         At this point, folks can buy what they want...but since I have been there and done that---the VMPS just works better than so many of them it isn't funny.  The press should be using VMPS as a reference to measure the other to see how well they (try)  to keep up. 
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: BSTURGEON89 on 2 Aug 2010, 01:52 am
John,       My intent with the review was to be as fair as possible, and provide a direct comparison to subs I have/had.  I have been recommended umpteen subs in the past, and they always fell short.  The best bang for the buck was the 15"  dayton titanic III.  I felt the burn when I ended up with subs that the maggie crowd recommended the REL, but that sub just didn't have the cajones.  The tube-snake boogie subs didn't impact or move air, and the porthole subs all sounded boomy and undefined to me.  At that point I said I need to cut my losses and stay with the least overall compromised and that was the dayton.         I will not that when certain companies come out with a sub, the press reviews EVERY SINGLE MODEL.  How long has it been since there has been any VMPS sub review like the new larger, super solid or VLA?  I dunno but I see reviews for seemingly every single other company--and the resultant  hype.  The VMPS subs are a well kept secret compared to REL, SVS or the others that seem to be mainstream press darlings.         At this point, folks can buy what they want...but since I have been there and done that---the VMPS just works better than so many of them it isn't funny.  The press should be using VMPS as a reference to measure the other to see how well they (try)  to keep up.

I have only had my VMPS for about a week and absolutely just love it!! I'm all ready to purchase a couple more hopefully in the near future. I haven't had countless subs but I do know that I will no longer be looking for anything else. I just can't see how there is another sub out that will sound any better than this.
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: Construct on 2 Aug 2010, 01:59 am
I have only had my VMPS for about a week and absolutely just love it!! I'm all ready to purchase a couple more hopefully in the near future. I haven't had countless subs but I do know that I will no longer be looking for anything else. I just can't see how there is another sub out that will sound any better than this.
Cool!.
Sadly a lot of subs don't as I pointed out in the review.  What people mistake all too often for great bass is actually boominess.  That, or just enough to fill in, but not rattle concrete.  I could get a 10"  sub to rattle wood panels, but that wasn't anything like really deep bass.
Seamless?  I know (for the billionth time)  the REL strata pairs with maggies.  People talk about musicality and fast bass.  Well the VMPS will blend with horns...and not suffer damping, definition or output.  Matching to maggies would be a breeze.  Not to mention the REL strata has less than half the power.  It's time people really knew what these subs can do.  When you listen to Rob Wasserman's bow on fingers dance on his electric bass and you get "you are there"  realism, definition and impact it's the right sub to have.  I am putting on some Anner Blysma tonight (Bach cello concertos)  and Jacqueline Du Pre  (Elgar concertos )  because they are a great test of sub integration and detail delivery.  It's about more than just SPL.
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: TomS on 2 Aug 2010, 02:39 am
Just a few questions as this sub seems a little unique in configuration and I don't quite get it  :)
- Are the 12" and 15" drivers driven by separate amp channels or are they wired together and driven by a single channel (4 ohms?)?
- What is the thinking of having 2 different size drivers in the same sub cabinet?
- Do the 12" and 15" actives both feed into the same chamber that the PR provides the venting for or is there something else going on in there (double chambers or whatever)?

Tom
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: Brian Cheney on 2 Aug 2010, 03:09 am
The idea is to stagger the resonances of the PR, 15", 12", and their combination in enclosure to have four low-Q resonances rather than two high Q resonances.  Also, the two 15" and single 12" move a lot of air; the 8 cu ft enclosure permits lower distortion and lower system Fs. When first designed in 1984 the woofer ran much higher in frequency, and the 12" had better directivity down to lower frequencies.  Nowadays everyone crosses over below 100Hz so this is not a consideration.
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: Construct on 2 Aug 2010, 01:59 pm
I listened for a couple hours last night...stopped in time for shark week.... (http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSFrgv58YXCCfqLKT_6nlIg-ppOe8sRhhnS41qlDUtdaP5bmAc&t=1&usg=__68OjcfMnTeVpSCFKNnLp2bbsItY=)


Notes:
 
Blysma/cello concerto:
 Not since listening to demos of Dunlavy SC-VI or duntech sovereigns have I really heard a controlled, 1st octave like this.  The sub has it from 60hz down.  Other speakers may give you the presence of the bass and maybe the timbre.  What I got here was a well-drawn image of the cello's vibrato and hollow-bodied acoustics.  It was a goose-bumpy moment when so much of the bass's character came out at a pressure and spl like a real, full sized cello.  I was reading the paperback of the band Rush:  middletown dreams, when I could feel the book resonate in my hands at some of the draws of the bow. The resonant frequency of that book is pretty low....

Speaking of Rush I was inspired to put "Signals"  on.  I got an effect from the synth pulse that I had not gotten since attending the concert.  There is more depth and "vibrato"  to the synth pulses than is apparent with smaller subs and speakers.  It's a whole different ballgame when some speakers omit the low end, can't reproduce the energy or simply get confused when reproducing these things.  Which brought me to...

The very best of Enya I just got this from amazon.  I listened to her version of an amazing choral "Oíche Chiúin "  (Silent night)  and other tracks like orinoco flow.  Enya has a much broader scope of complexity and power than you'd expect.  There are a lot of percussive effects ranging from everything you might find in a full scale orchestra.  Just orinoco flow tends to bewilder some speakers because there is a lot going on in the bass region.  Not just sub bass---but 40-80hz that really needs control to sort out.  Too often systems reproduce this track on a simpler level  and just don't "get it."



Shark week is here! :thumb:
"Ultimate air jaws"  has some amazing footage!


 (http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:Qzwt8heAE-xroM:http://danielfranklingomez.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/shark.jpg&t=1)

Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: Construct on 2 Aug 2010, 06:36 pm
I just found out class d audio has an amp that will drive down to 1 ohm stable.  It has at least 250 wpc into 8 ohms.  An aluminum case can be purchased on ebay for $47--U drill it. 
This might be the ticket to high quality/high current for a very affordable price...IE under $400.
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: Construct on 5 Aug 2010, 05:37 am
After much internal monologue and examination, I have decided it is counterproductive to upgrade my enclosure to the Tc sounds drivers.  My concerns are that the construction  and lack of proper bracing would result in disaster.  The hefty and powerful drivers would likely pull out, or vibrate the crap out of the box making unwanted noise and threaten structural integrity. With TC sounds drivers, the only way to go would be at least 1.5"  board or more.  That, or a VSS box.
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: Construct on 6 Aug 2010, 03:53 am
I ended up taking 2 more "fingernails"  of putty out.  The drivers seem to be a little more compliant now anyway.  Better articulation and depth. 
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: JLM on 6 Aug 2010, 03:22 pm
Construct,

Thanks for an excellent write up.  I'm so with you on the need, qualities, and requirements of foundational bass.  Most ignore the necessity of big room and separation of the amp from the sub.

Years ago I had separate bass cabinets capable of114 dB at 17 Hz (6 cu. ft. transmission lines using an 8 inch driver from I. M. Fried).  But I lacked a room big enough to allow them to sound even decent.  Finally took them to a 20,000 cu. ft. chapel and was blown away using my NAD 3020.  They were musical, graceful, and powerful.  I was so blown away that I donated them to the church.  Probably would be a category 4 sub by your scale.

How big is your room and what would you guess is the minimum for this sub?


BTW I’m a fan of big B’s style and much of the VMPS stuff.  So sad that the Michigan dealer gave up the line. 
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: Construct on 6 Aug 2010, 03:44 pm
Construct,

Thanks for an excellent write up.  I'm so with you on the need, qualities, and requirements of foundational bass.  Most ignore the necessity of big room and separation of the amp from the sub.

Years ago I had separate bass cabinets capable of114 dB at 17 Hz (6 cu. ft. transmission lines using an 8 inch driver from I. M. Fried).  But I lacked a room big enough to allow them to sound even decent.  Finally took them to a 20,000 cu. ft. chapel and was blown away using my NAD 3020.  They were musical, graceful, and powerful.  I was so blown away that I donated them to the church.  Probably would be a category 4 sub by your scale.

How big is your room and what would you guess is the minimum for this sub?


BTW I’m a fan of big B’s style and much of the VMPS stuff.  So sad that the Michigan dealer gave up the line.
I remember Fried, good designer!  His speakers have become kind of a collectors edition.  If you are going to use a 15"  sub, let alone something like this I'd have to do the math, and Brian Cheney has no doubt done so.  My guess is that it would work ok in a 20x12 room with an 8' ceiling as a minimum.  I am judging from varying seating position. 
IIRC, Brian isn't much of a fan of transmission lines as some can be perceived as lagging or slow.  I kind of enjoyed a few TL speakers I listened to like PMC and bug tussel.
I have some pipe organ stuff, the classics (requiem etc)  and also a disc "Cantate domino"  which has subsonic notes that are more perceived by feeling the vibration than  hearing. 
If I did this over again, I'd forgo the New larger sub, and dive into the Very Solid sub with a TC sounds driver.  That thing is bound to be many DB stronger at 14hz. 
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: BobRex on 6 Aug 2010, 04:33 pm
Years ago I had separate bass cabinets capable of114 dB at 17 Hz (6 cu. ft. transmission lines using an 8 inch driver from I. M. Fried).  But I lacked a room big enough to allow them to sound even decent.  Finally took them to a 20,000 cu. ft. chapel and was blown away using my NAD 3020.  They were musical, graceful, and powerful.  I was so blown away that I donated them to the church.  Probably would be a category 4 sub by your scale.

Did you have the the H bass bin or the M cabinets?  I used to sell Frieds and for the longest time the M was by reference for true bass.  Very few speakers came close for the same money.
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: Brian Cheney on 6 Aug 2010, 05:07 pm
I knew Bud Fried and liked his designs.  However, I have not been a TL fan since a demo I heard about 20 years back using an impulse signal as input.  One pulse in resulted in two distinct, audible pulses out.

TL delay can be pleasant on most music material, however.
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: bsoko2 on 27 Jun 2011, 08:49 pm
The VMPS Large sub with Mega Woofers, and added a TC Sounds 15" Pr to it. This sub has the most detailed SQ that I have ever heard. I bought the one I have used and am so impressed that I'm selling my Epik Conquest. I have ordered another VMPS Large sub! Now I'll have duals in a 6000+ cu ft room open to other parts of the house.

Bill
Title: Re: VMPS NEW Larger SUB
Post by: pocket.change on 23 Sep 2017, 10:37 pm
The bug bit me (recently.)
I replaced the OE drivers in my (old) New Larger with the Dayton RSS 12" (HO) & the 15" (HF.)  After playing the combination(s) and killing a second screw gun, the above is the combo, that sounds respectable.
If for whatever reason you should decide to follow this path, be forewarned, the frame openings need to be increased (which is a real PITA.)  pc