Proper power for Vandersteen Model 3

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 239 times.

mgsboedmisodpc2

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 298
Proper power for Vandersteen Model 3
« on: 17 Jul 2017, 05:01 pm »
I have been powering my vandersteen Model 3 with a Prima Luna 5 power amp.
The Prima Luna is rated at 20 watts using KT88 or 6550 tubes.
I am using KT120 power tubes currently and so I figure the wattage rating is higher.
Recently I decided to purchase a vintage power amp and have it referbushed rather than purchasing a new amp. The amp was purchased in "not working order" from ebay. I was able to send the amp to a outfit whose specialilty was repairing this brand of amplifier once with NOS surplus stock now with the best available appropriate parts due to NOS surplus being used up.
This amp when new was rated at 350 watts per channel into 8Ω (stereo). The rebuilt amp's specs should also be similar.  I have always felt I was not getting the most out the Model 3 bass wise. I no longer have that opinion when using the refurbished amp. The new amp has such grip  over the bass that I can feel each bass note individually not just hear it.  I guess pressurization of the listening area is what I am trying to describe. Currently I feel I do not have a need to use the 2WQ sub. But I am sure that will change once I listen to some DNB (Drum and Bass) tracks which has a great deal of electronic sub bass energy which the model 3 may not be able to produce as well as the 2WQ and in fact might even be damaged by a 350 watts amp.

ctsooner

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 258
Re: Proper power for Vandersteen Model 3
« Reply #1 on: 20 Jul 2017, 01:58 pm »
Thanks for sharing. Yes, any of the Vandersteen speakers will sound better with better amplification.  Sounds like you have found a better amp and also a more powerful one. Congrats. That's really cool when you get better sound by upgrading your other components.  Too many folks don't realize that you can run better and better electronics on the Vandersteen speakers and hear how great the amp is.  That's why I tell folks to buy new and get the model lower if you need to. That way you get the 5 year warrantee and any upgrade path's in the future.  Then take any extra money and upgrade the electronics.  Cables can be done AFTER all of that is done.  The 3 surely can move air in a room.  Personally I feel it needs a powerful amp to control the bass. 

Keep doing other upgrades and you will get better and better sound.  I just upgraded to the Horizon (WEL) balanced interconnects and it was a HOLY CRAP moment.  Betters the Odin's in my system by a country mile.  I've had many top cables in the system to audition, but this was the first and only time I said that I needed to do this.  I got them used from a friend, but it was worth every dime.


mgsboedmisodpc2

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 298
Re: Proper power for Vandersteen Model 3
« Reply #2 on: 20 Jul 2017, 03:33 pm »
Even listening to FM radio the sound is so much more punchier with 375 watts of magnetic field power on the model 3's than with just 20 watts of tube power at a perceived volume level.

ctsooner

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 258
Re: Proper power for Vandersteen Model 3
« Reply #3 on: 21 Jul 2017, 06:57 pm »
No surprise at all....Other than moving tightening up the low end, do you notice differences in the rest of the spectrum?  I personally have noticed major differences when adding more current to the mix.  We all know that often you can double the tube number when going against SS amps.  My Ayre doubles down to 2 ohms.  Most amps can't do that.  I have noticed a big difference between the Ayre vs some other big name (and smaller ones) amps that can't double into 4ohms.  I am getting much more control over the whole spectrum and the speed is so much better also. 

I am very interested in this thread as folks are always asking, is my X wattage tube amp enough.  Usually it is as most of us don't listen at concert volumes and many don't have huge rooms.  Many aren't talking about an amp controlling the drivers, but it's a big deal.  Again, are there any other noticeable differences?

mgsboedmisodpc2

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 298
Re: Proper power for Vandersteen Model 3
« Reply #4 on: 23 Jul 2017, 02:11 pm »
"are there any other noticeable differences?"
Staying with the bass topic I have also noticed the Model3's slight bass resonance not existing with the model 2.
There are other differences which I will try to point out for example the prima luna 5 with KT120 tubes has a more delicate mid range

ctsooner

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 258
Re: Proper power for Vandersteen Model 3
« Reply #5 on: 23 Jul 2017, 02:54 pm »
Shows how detailed the speakers are.  It also proves how much your amplification means.  So many just talk about their wattage (not even the current and doubling capacity).  Almost as though my D9ck is bigger than your's, when in fact it's a ton of things that enter into a great sounding amp.

This is one reason I love my Ayre.  It's not tube, nor is it SS sounding per say.  Full bass control as you are taking about, but it also has a delicious and delicate high end along with the speed in the mids to show off how fast Vandersteen's mid range unit really are.  There are plenty of great amps, both SS and Tube (or hybrids) that will show off how great even the 2's can sound.  I once had a dealer drop a set of 2's into his high end room.  He brought in a cheap NAD system that had decent power. 

He then played the 2's with both systems.  He used a top table set up as a source.  I've done this myself at home as also at other dealers when auditioning less expensive speakers to see what their top sound could be.  All the speakers I've ever done this with have gotten better and most much better.  That said, there were only a handful that really showed themselves off and the 2's certainly were on that short list.

Keep sharing the differences.  Pretty interesting as I think we will find out the short comings of each amp, lol...as well as how great they can be.